|
Chennai:
Corporate
communications is usually a one way flow of good news.
However, global credit ratings firms, who derive their
business from corporates, do not hesitate to blow the
whistle.
Says
Lisa Hall, communications director, Standard and Poors
(S&P), Our aim is to provide timely, objective
and accurate opinions on various corporates to the market.
These comprise upgrades as well as downgrades of a company's
rating. Sometimes the news isn't always positive.
For
credit ratings firms like S&P the job is often perilous;
these firms risk falling foul of sovereign governments
for downgrading their ratings. Further an error of judgement
may deal a great blow not only to the rated organisation
but also to S&P.
How
do these firms ensure their credibility? Presenting
the information in an accurate and timely manner is the
way out, replies Hall.
Our
ratings are subject to intense scrutiny by investors and
other market participants every day. Their views are the
ultimate test of our credibility. We constantly re-evaluate
and improve our ratings criteria and methodology to ensure
we provide the most accurate, timely and relevant information
for investors, she elaborates.
That
is how credit ratings agencies attract stakeholders like
investors, issuers and others. The volatility and
complexity of the current market situation makes the need
for our independent research and analysis more relevant
than ever. S&P has been instrumental in helping markets
evaluate and assess credit risk, price debt securities,
benchmark debt issues and create a robust secondary market
for those issues - to the benefit of investors and issuers
alike, says Hall.
Nevertheless
S&P did have some anxious moments in the Enron issue
as its role was questioned. S&P had then said that
Enron did not disclose the debt-like nature of certain
structured finance transactions and their effect on Enrons
financial situation.
Speaking
about handling crisis situations, Hall says that S&Ps
main objective is to fully cooperate with investigators,
disclose all information and be transparent, open and
honest in all communications.
According
to her an organisation should have a crisis communications
plan in place so that a crisis does not catch it on the
backfoot. Not to get panicky is her prescription
while handling communication during a crisis.
|